Credit Risk Models For Five Major Sectors In Indonesia

  • Ndari Surjaningsih Bank Indonesia
  • Ina Nurmalia Kurniati Bank Indonesia
  • Reni Indriani Bank Indonesia
Keywords: Banking, Panel Data Models


This paper analyze Nonperforming Loan ratio to total credit (NPL), as a proxy for
credit risk, for five major economic sectors by utilizing panel data of 117 commercial
banks in Indonesia over period 2000Q1 to 2016Q3. Our empirical analysis shows that
real economic growth is the main driver that is negatively correlated with credit risks
in all sectors. The inverse relation is also found in commodity and housing price.
Commodity price inflation affects NPL in manufacturing industry and trade sectors,
meanwhile housing price inflation influences NPL in manufacturing industry, trade,
and construction sectors. In addition, decreased in policy rate will decline credit risk
in commodity, trade, and other sectors, meanwhile nominal exchange rate only affects
credit risks in other sector. Our assessment shows that credit risks in commodity and
other sectors are more sensitive to real economic growth than those on manufacturing
industry and trade sectors. Real economic growth elasticities to credit risk for
commodity and other sectors are almost twice higher than for manufacturing industry
and trade sectors. Thus, during economic contraction phase, NPL in commodity and
other sectors will increase higher than NPL in manufacturing industry and trade


Download data is not yet available.


Alexandri, M.B., Santoso, T.I. (2015). Non Performing Loan: Impact of Internal and
External Factor (Evidence in Indonesia). International Journal of Humanities and
Social Science Invention, 4.
Arellano, M. and Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data:
Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. Review
of Economic Studies, 5, 277-297.
Bank Indonesia. (2017). Kajian Stabilitas Keuangan – Mitigasi Risiko Sistemik Melalui
Penguatan Koordinasi Antar Institusi di Tengah Konsolidasi Perekonomian Domestik.
KSK Maret 2017. Bank Indonesia.
Beaton, K., Myrvoda, A., Thompson, S. (2016). Non-Performing Loans in the ECCU:
Determinants and Macroeconomic Impact, IMF Working Paper WP/16/229.
Beck, R. Jakubik, P. and Piloiu, A. (2015). Key Determinants of Non-performing
Loans: New Evidence from a Global Sample. Open Economies Review, Springer,
vol. 26, 525-550.
Buncic, D. and Melecky, M.. (2012). Macroprudential Stress Testing of Credit Risk –
A Practical Approach for Policy Makers, World Bank Policy Research Working
Paper No.5936.
Curak, M., Pepur, S., Poposki, K. (2013). Determinants of Non-performing Loans
– evidence from Southeastern European banking systems, Banks and Bank
System, 8.
Firmansyah, I. (2014). Determinant of Non Performing Loan : The Case of Islamic
Bank in Indonesia. Bulletin of Monetary, Economics, and Banking, 17.
Jakubik, P. and Reininger, T. (2013). What are the Key Determinants of
Nonperforming Loans in CESEE. Focus on European Economic Integration Q3/13.
Judson, R. and Owen, L. (1999). Estimating Dynamic Panel Data Models: A Guide
for Macroeconomists. Economic Letters, 65, 9-15.
Klein, Nir. (2013). Non-Performing Loans in CESEE: Determinants and Impact on
Macroeconomic Performance, IMF Working Paper WP/13/72.
Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects. Econometrica, 49,
Nkusu, M. (2011). Nonperforming Loans and Macrofinancial Vulnerabilities in
Advanced Economies, IMF Working Paper WP/11/161.
Sari, B.W., Priyarsono, D.S., Anggraeni, L. (2015). Bank-Specific and Macroeconomic
Determinants of Non-Performing Loan of Regional Development Banks in
Indonesia. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR).
Surjaningsih, N., et al. (2016). Implementasi Skenario Makro dan Solvency Stress
Test. Mimeo. Bank Indonesia.
Vatansever, M. and Hepsen, A. (2013). Determining Impacts on Non-Performing
Loan Ratio in Turkey. Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, 2.
How to Cite
Surjaningsih, N., Kurniati, I., & Indriani, R. (2018). Credit Risk Models For Five Major Sectors In Indonesia. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter Dan Perbankan, 20(4), 409-428.