DAMPAK PERSISTENSI EKSES LIKUIDITAS TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN MONETER

  • M. Barik Bathaluddin Bank Indonesia
  • Nur M. Adhi P. Bank Indonesia
  • Wahyu Ari Wibowo Bank Indonesia

Abstract

This paper analyzes the excess liquidity especially on banking industry and its impact on monetary policy on Indonesia. We firstly investigate the determinants of bank behavior on their favor for excess liquidity both for precautionary motive and involuntary, and furthermore determine the threshold between low and high excess liquidity regimes. On the next step, this paper evaluates the impact of excess liquidity on monetary policy on the two regimes. Thefirst result shows that the excess liquidity on bank with their precautionary motive is significantly determined by the volatility of money demand, volatility of economic growth, the bank cost of the bank, and also the lag of excess liquidity, which conform its persistence. Secondly, using the Threshold-VAR approach, this paper shows the switching regime occurs in 2005 from low to high excess liquidity. Lastly, the excess liquidity reduces the effectiveness of monetary policy on controlling inflation.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ben S. Bernanke dan Ilian Mihov, 1995, “Measuring Monetary Policy,”NBER Working Papers 5145, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

Bernanke, Ben S dan Blinder, Alan S, 1992, “The Federal Funds Rate and the Channels of Monetary Transmission,” American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 82(4), pages 901-21, September.

Biro Riset Ekonomi, 2008, “Menghadapi Ekses Likuiditas dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Efektivitas Kebijakan Moneter,” Miemo.

Henry et. al, 2010, “The Dynamics of Involuntary Commercial Bank’s Reserves in Trinidad and Tobago”, 42nd Annual Monetary Studies Conference Financial Stability, Crisis Preparedness and Risk Management in the Caribbean.

Kiki Nindya Asih, 2005, “Telaah Sederhana Kondisi Likuiditas Perbankan dan Implikasi Kebijakan,” Ulasan Pojok, vol II No. 10, Juni.

Krolzig, Hans-Martin, 1998, “Econometric Modeling of Markov-Switching vector Autoregressions unsing MSVAR for Ox”(unpublished:Oxford, United Kingdom:University of Oxford).

Lawrence J. Christiano, Martin Eichenbaum dan Charles L. Evans, 1998, “Monetary Policy Shocks: What Have We Learned and to What End?,”NBER Working Papers 6400, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

Magnus Saxegaard, 2006, “Excess Liquidity and the Effectiveness of Monetary Policy: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa,”IMF Working Papers 06/115, International Monetary Fund.

N. Joko Prastowo & Andry Prasmuko, 2008, “Penurunan Portfolio SBI, Pertumbuhan Kredit dan Kondisi Likuiditas Perbankan,” Mimeo.

P.R. Agenor, J. Aizenman dan A. Hoffmaister, 2000, “The Credit Crunch in East Asia: What can Bank Excess Liquid Assets Tell us?,”NBER Working Papers 7951, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

Stephen O’Connell, 2005, “A Floor and Ceiling Model of U.S. Output,” Journal of Economics Dynamic and Control, Vol. 21, pp. 661-95.
Published
2012-03-30
How to Cite
Bathaluddin, M. B., Adhi P., N. M., & Wibowo, W. A. (2012). DAMPAK PERSISTENSI EKSES LIKUIDITAS TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN MONETER. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter Dan Perbankan, 14(3), 257-282. https://doi.org/10.21098/bemp.v14i3.359
Section
Articles