• Ferry Syarifuddin
  • Ahmad Hidayat
  • Tarsidin Tarsidin


Non-cash payments have been increasing significantly, followed by its substitution and efficiency effects. Cash payment is substituted, inducing decrease of cash holding by economic agents, while on the other hand more money enters the banking system. The increase of non-cash payments also cuts transaction costs, and the economy runs more efficiently.

Using Structural Cointegrating VAR, its impacts on the economy are investigated. The result shows that cash holding decrease, while money stock M1 and M2 increase. The increase of non-cash payments also induces GDP growth and slight price decrease. Its implication to monetary policy is also analyzed, showing decrease of BI rate and monetary policy cost.

JEL Classification: E41, E51, E58

Keywords: non-cash, payment system, money demand


Download data is not yet available.


Amromin, Gene dan Chakravorti, Sujit. “Debit Card and Cash-Usage: A Cross-Country Analysis”. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Working Paper, No. WP 2007-04, Maret 2007.

Bank for International Settlements. Implications for Central Banks of the Development of Electronic Money. Basle: BIS, Oktober 1996.

Bofinger, Peter. Monetary Policy: Goals, Institutions, Strategies, and Instruments. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

Boswijk, H. Peter dan Doornik, Jurgen A. Identifying, Estimating, and Testing Restricted Cointegrated Systems: An Overview. Januari 2003.

Dias, Joilson. Digital Money: Review of Literature and Simulation of Welfare Improvement of This Technological Advance. State University of Maringa, 2001.

Ekananda, Mahyus. Ketidakpastian Pengaruh Volatilitas Nilai Tukar terhadap Ekspor Komoditi Manufaktur di Indonesia. Disertasi. Depok: FEUI, 2003.

Garratt, Anthony; Lee, Kevin; Pesaran, M. Hashem; dan Shin, Yongcheol. A Structural Cointegrating VAR Approach to Macroeconometric Modelling. Januari 1999.

Handa, Jagdish. Monetary Economics. London: Routledge, 2000.

Harris, Richard. Using Cointegration Analysis in Econometric Modelling. London: Prentice Hall- Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1995.

Humphrey, David B.; Pulley, Lawrence B.; dan Vesala, Jukka M. “Cash, Paper, and Electronic Payments: A Cross-Country Analysis.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, November 1996, 28(4-2), 914-939.

Kapetanios, George; Mitchell, James; dan Weale, Martin R. Cointegrating VAR Models with Endogenous I(0) Variables: Theoretical Extensions and An Application to UK Monetary Policy. National Institute of Economic and Social Research. Agustus 2000.

Pramono, Bambang; Yanuarti, Tri; Purusitawati, Pipih D.; dan Emmy, Yosefin Tyas. “Dampak Pembayaran Non Tunai terhadap Perekonomian dan Kebijakan Moneter.” Working Paper Bank Indonesia, No WP/11/2006, September 2006.

Santomero, Anthony M. dan Seater, John J. “Alternative Monies and the Demand for Media of Exchange.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, November 1996, 28(4-2), 942-960.

Smith, Gregor W. “A Dynamic of Baumol-Tobin Model of Money Demand.” The Review of Economic Studies, Juli 1986, 53(3), 465-469.

Van Hove, Leo. “Central Banks and Payment Instruments: a Serious Case of Schizophrenia.” Communications and Strategies, No. 66, 2nd Quarter 2007.

Woodford, Michael. “Monetary Policy in a World Without Money.” NBER Working Paper, No. 7853, Agustus 2000.
How to Cite
Syarifuddin, F., Hidayat, A., & Tarsidin, T. (2009). DAMPAK PENINGKATAN PEMBAYARAN NON-TUNAI TERHADAP PEREKONOMIAN DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP PENGENDALIAN MONETER DI INDONESIA. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter Dan Perbankan, 11(4), 369-402. https://doi.org/10.21098/bemp.v11i4.346