• Endy Dwi Tjahjono
  • Jardine Husman
  • Desthy Sianipar


This study estimates the level of capacity utilization using the dual cost approach in which capacity utilization is measured by the deviation of shadow cost to observe cost. This approach provides valuable economic analysis which is not offered by the traditional or engineering approach, such as the production cost structure and the production system efficiency. The estimation results of 1996-2003 annual data on nine industries sub sector using panel data shows that the estimated capacity utilizations based on dual cost approach tend to exceed those of traditional approach. However, in general, the level of capacity utilization is still below full capacity although some of the industries have reached the level of 80%. The empirical results also shows that in term of output gap indicator, the dual cost capacity utilization outperforms the traditional one so that it can be used as a better tool in monetary policy formulation process.

Keywords: Capacity utilization, Capital and Investments, Cost Function, Panel data

JEL Classification: C23, D24, E22


Download data is not yet available.


Berndt, E. R., and C.J. Morrison. 1981. Capacity Utilization Measures: Underlying Economic Theory and Alternative Approach. American Economic Review, Vol. 71, No. 2. May, pp. 48 57.

Berndt, E.R. and D. Hesse. 1986. Measuring and Assessing Capacity Utilization Measures in the manufacturing Sectors of Nine OECD Countries. European Economic Review, Vol. 30, pp. 961-989.

Brown, R.S. and L.R. Christensen. 1981. Estimating Elasticities of Substitution in a Model of partial Static Equilibrium: An Application to U.S. Agriculture 1947 to 1974, in E.R. Berndt and B.C. Fields (eds.). Modeling and Measuring Natural Resource Substitution. Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press, pp.209-229.

Cassels, J.M. 1937. Excess Capacity and Monopolistic Competition. Quarterly Journal of Economics. May Vol. 51, pp.426-443.

Diewert, W.E. 1985. The Measurement of Economic Benefits of Infrastucture Services. Discussion Paper. No.85-11. Department of Economics. University of British Colombia.

Fraser, I. 2002. The Cobb-Douglas Production Function: An Antipodean Defence?. Journal of Economics Issues. Vol.7, part 1. March, pp.39-58.

Hulten, C.R. 1986. Short Run and Long Run Cost Function and the Measurement of Efficiency Change. Journal of Econometrics. Vol. 33, No. 1 / 2. October / November, pp. 31-50.

Hutabarat, Akhis R; Rizki E. Wimanda, Rendra Z. Idris. 2001 Pengukuran Output Potensial Indonesia. Program Kerja Strategis Bagian Studi Sektor Riil, Direktorat Riset Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Moneter Bank Indonesia.

Klein, L.R. 1960. Some Theoretical Issues in the Measurement of Capacity. Econometrica. April. Vol. 28, pp.272-286.

Morrison, C.J. 1985. Primal and Dual Capacity utilization: An Application to Productivity Measurement in the U.S. Automobile Industry. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics. Vol.3, No.4. October, pp. 312-324.

Morrison, C.J. 1988a. Capacity utilization and Productivity Measurement: An Application to the U.S. Automobile Industry, in A. Dogramaci (ed.) Studies in Productivity Analysis. Boston:

Kluwer Nijhoff Press, pp. 163-193. Morrison, C.J. 1988b. Quasi-Fized Inputs in U.S. and Japanese Manufacturing: A Generalized Leontief Restricted Cost Function Approach. Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 70, No. 2. May, pp. 275-287.

Morrison, C.J. 1989. Unraveling the Productivity Growth Slowdown in the U.S. Canada, and Japan: The Effects of Subequilibrium, Scale Economies and markups. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper. No. 2993. June.

Nelson, Randy A. 1989. On the Measurememnt of Capacity utilization. The Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 37, No. 3, 273-286.

Shebeb, Bassim. Measuring Capacity utilization Using a Short-Run Cost Function: An Application to Bahrain Economy. ERF Working Paper Series, Working Paper 0305.