• Jie Zhu
Keywords: Equity risk premium, Greater China, Relative estimation, Required rate of return


The expected equity risk premium is a key input of many asset prcing models innance. There exist a number of methods to estimate the risk premium. It is alsowell documented that the risk premium is time-varying. This paper briey reviews twodi¤erent approaches. More specically, the historical average and relative estimationare taken into closer examination. The rst approach is applied to estimate equity riskpremium for stock markets in Greater China when the stock markets were recoveringfrom the bottom. Then the relative estimation approach is also adopted to empiricaldata to justify the ndings in the rst one, which takes into consideration the lowerrequired rate of return for Chinese investors due to lack of investment opportunities.After making these adjustments, we nd that risk premium in mainland China is close torisk premium for Hong Kong and Taiwan markets. All of those markets have higher riskpremium compared to US market. The risk premium for Shanghai and Shenzhen marketare about 8% and 10% respectively. For Hong Kong and Taiwan these numbers become8% and 9%, where the long-term forward-looking risk premium for US market is about4%.


Ang, A. & Bekaert, G. (2002). International Asset Allocation with Regime Shifts.
Review of Financial Studies, 15, 1137-1187.
Bailey, W. (1994). Risk and Return on China‘s New Stock Markets: Some
Preliminary Evidence. Pacific−Basin Finance Journal, 2, 243-260.
Blume, M. E. (1974). Unbiased Estimators of Long Run Expected Rates of Return.
Journal of the American Statistical Association 69, 347.
Campbell, R., Koedijk, K., & Kofman, P (2002). Increased Correlation in Bear
Markets. Financial Analyst Journal, 58, 87-94.
Chen, G. M., Lee, B.S., & Kofman, B. (2001). Foreign Ownership Restrictions and
Market Segmentation in China’s Stock Markets. Journal of Financial Research,
24, 133-155.
Cooper, I. (1996). Arithmatic versus Geometric Estimators: Setting Discount Rates
for Capital Budgeting. European Financial Management, 2, 157-168.
Damodaran, A. (1999) Estimating Equity Risk Premiums. New York University,
Leonard N. Stern School Finance Department Working Paper Series, 99-121.
Damodaran, A. (2008). Equity Risk Premiums (ERP): Determinants, Estimation
and Implications. New York University, Stern School of Business, Working Paper
Dimson, E., Marsh, P. , & Staunton, M. (2003). Global Evidence on the Equity Risk
Premium. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 15, 27-38.
Erb, C. B., Harvey, C. R., & Viskanta, T. E. (1994). Forecasting International
Correlation. Financial Analysts Journal, 50, 32-45.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2001). Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm
Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay?. Journal of Financial Economics, 60,
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2002). The Equity Premium. Journal of Finance, 57,
Fernald, J., & Rogers, J. H. (2002). Puzzles in the Chinese Stock Market. Review of
Ego−nomics and Statistics, 84, 416-432.
Gordon, M. (1962). The Investment Financing and Valuation of the Corporation.
Irwin, Homewood, IL.
Goetzmann, W. N., & Ibbotson, R. G. (2005). History and the Equity Risk Premium.
Yale IGF Working Paper, 04−05.
Mehra, R., & Prescott, E. C. (1985). The Equity Premium: A Puzzle. Journal of
Monetary Economics, 15, 145-161.
Patton, A. (2004). On the Out-of-Sample Importance of Skewness and Asymmetric
De- pendence for Asset Allocation. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2, 130-168.
Poon, S. H., Rockinger, M., & Twan, J. (2006). Extreme Value Dependence in
Financial Markets: Diagnostics, Models, and Financial Implications. Review of
Financial Studies, 17, 581-610.
Sun, Q., & Tong, W. H. (2000). The Effect of Market Segmentation on Stock Prices:
The China Syndrome. Journal of Banking and Finance, 24, 1875-1902.
Yang, J. (2003). Market Segmentation and Information Asymmetry in Chinese
Stock Mar- kets: A VAR Analysis. The Financial Review, 38, 591-609.